Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:28:43
Can any Chinese math genius answer my question regarding the binomial expansion of e[-] bakemonor | 7 points | Dec 03 2021 15:47:54
good cock difficult
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 2 points | Dec 03 2021 15:49:59
好雞巴難?
I use zhinabaidu translate.
[-] Top_Yellow_4690 | 7 points | Dec 03 2021 15:51:10
充其量就是e^x 泰勒展开取x=1。
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:52:48
你沒答鄙人問題啊
[-] Top_Yellow_4690 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:57:21
我一般是把极限写进去,先求极限,再求和。
[-] Top_Yellow_4690 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 16:00:05
我学工科的,不懂严格证明,但做题时可以这么写。
[-] 1q956_ | 4 points | Dec 03 2021 16:02:24
原式=∑n!/ n\^k(n-k)!k!
=∑ Cnk/n\^k
=∑ Cnk* n\^(n-k) /n\^n
=∑ Cnk* n\^(n-k)*1\^k /n\^n
=(1+n)\^n/n\^n=(1+1/n)\^n
n-&rt;∞ 原式-&rt;e
[-] 1q956_ | 2 points | Dec 03 2021 16:03:15
这个说法可以解决op的问题么
[-] XWN_BS | 4 points | Dec 03 2021 17:50:54
数学tv
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:30:14
My thought is:
&rt; Since k will range from 0 to n, so when k is sufficiently large, say 𝑛/2,
then( 𝑛−𝑘+1)/𝑛 won't simply be 1.
What is my mistake? Should this question violate the rules of this sub. I will remove it. :((((
[-] 1q956_ | 3 points | Dec 03 2021 15:51:31
如果你把k取到n/2的话 那右边的1/k!就趋向于0了
[-] Specific_Job6294 | 2 points | Dec 03 2021 17:54:47
k不能取n/2,无穷不允许这样。
[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 16:12:53
[removed]
[-] Press_F_Pay_Respect | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:14:23
这种式子里的k取你妈值呢?就一个dummy variable表示从0乘到n而已。
要证这种式子需要数学归纳法
[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:48:36
[removed]
[-] Googrosoft | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 18:32:45
Switch the sum and lim sign. All the terms ahead of 1/k! converge at 1 when n-&rt;inf since they always have the same highest order of n. And obviously sum(1/k!)=e when k runs from 0 to n (inf).
[-] plsmxy | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:39:04
/homeworkhelp
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:47:26
不是功課 支那老師根本不會管我這些無聊無意義的問題
[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 15:55:46
[deleted]
[-] XiXiP | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 16:02:58
lim_{n-&rt;\infty} (n+k-1)/n = lim_{n-&rt;\infty} (n)/n
[-] FrostingCreative1328 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 16:24:24
check: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/860796/how-to-show-that-sum-n-0-infty-frac-1n-e
You should be able to find it in an elementary real analysis textbook. e.g. Rudin
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:26:37
thanks for your help.
[-] poiulkjh87 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:23:07
這什麼鬼
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:27:05
支鬼
[-] poiulkjh87 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:29:37
Where did you see this problem ? college calculus class or analysis class?
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 18:06:41
出錯了嗎
[-] poiulkjh87 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 18:13:54
Nothing just curious
[-] No-Hunt-4486 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:35:47
明天细看,今晚娱乐一下
[-] PillowDoctor | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 17:54:29
不会做微积分bc,屠了屠了
[-] New-Edge-8765 | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 19:02:49
什么做题家tv
[-] CommieEater | 1 points | Dec 04 2021 05:21:19
Me and my gang are literally illiterate so I'd suggest you go and consult with Dr Xi directly
[-] cprwwww | 1 points | Dec 04 2021 05:44:06
英语不好请见谅。
因为k与n不是一起趋于无穷的,是将k先固定为一个实数,使n趋于无穷,再将k趋于无穷
[-] DecadeBodyBuilding | 12 points | Dec 03 2021 16:07:47
定义是e=lim(1+1/n)^n 你二项式展开不就是这个吗? 你在证个鸡巴。
[-] [deleted] | 1 points | Dec 03 2021 16:16:46
[removed]
[-] Ok_Scientist_691 | 0 points | Dec 04 2021 05:35:25
我是問當k 很大的時候,為何1/k!之前的項可以當作1
[-] DecadeBodyBuilding | 1 points | Dec 04 2021 05:41:06
也没人当成1啊, 有哪本书证明e等于那个求和是直接写前面的项当成1所以能相等吗。