FormosanMacaque | 1 points | May 05 2022 20:57:23

有沒有比較客觀的支國古代考古學?

最近在找支國考古來配著阿姨讀,想問神通廣大的浪人有沒有好的學者,英文的也行?

中文的農場文就不說了,通常都在打手槍,跟你說大家都同源、但不是西來。但可怕的是連學術文章都是這種白癡。中原進鐵器時代比西亞晚快800年。你覺得是鐵器打銅器的遊牧名民族打輸漢人、還是碳水恩造的漢人被殖民後,洗掉遊牧民族統治者的基因比較有可能? 相信各位浪人都很聰明,但名字一排支國人的學者結論就會給你這樣下:

Finally, most of the ancient northern groups gradually disappeared. Because of the large differences in lifestyle and culture between farmers and nomads, most of the ancient northern ethnic populations might have migrated to other areas when they were defeated, and their lands were gradually occupied by the Han Chinese.
唯一的出處就是說歐洲也是這樣。就跟你說支或贏,結案。但實際上歐洲原本的農耕民族也是被高加索的遊牧民族幹到飛起,只剩Sardinia島有純種。不知道支國人哪來的自信...

[-] Particular_Scallion | 1 points | May 06 2022 13:32:29

支国就连历史学都得为政治服务