toosimpleyoung | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 15:33:05
支那为何是世界上最劣等的民族谁是最优秀的种族?大和民族和犹太民族数一数二,美国不算民族的话,剩下的日耳曼和盎格鲁萨克逊也名列前茅,谁最优秀看个人喜好,没有定论,不过谁是世界上最劣等的民族到是毫无争议的---支那汉族当之无愧,至于为什么,多在热汉玩玩慢慢体会吧,懒得说那么多。
补充一下
我个人认为大和民族最优秀,看看他们在那个贫瘠的孤岛创下的伟业就很说明问题。
提供一个支那汉族劣等的证据:世界上有哪个民族受统治阶级如此残酷镇压,虐待,屠戮。。。和平时期付出上亿人的性命,在资讯如此发达的今天还如此对封建独裁统治集团感恩戴德?没有,世界上绝对没有,即使是非洲食人部落也不会如此愚昧,类似的例子前苏联屠杀的国民和支共虽略逊一筹,但接近,但苏联是一个杂交的“国家”斯大林杀的很多是非俄罗斯民族,而且苏联人民对苏共从来只有恐惧和敬畏却没有顶礼膜拜,这是屈从于暴力为自身和家人的安全计,蝼蚁尚且偷生,何况人了,还可以部分理解,随着资讯的发达和整个共运在国际上的崩溃,苏联人民勇敢的推翻了暴政,清算了苏共的罪行,不愧是传统的欧洲国家,看看支那,杀的可都是纯种的汉人,而支那愚民和平时期付出上亿人的性命后,丝毫不会对支共反思抗争,仍然一如既往的愚昧透顶,成日里处于极度的受虐狂高潮的亢奋状态,这样的民族难道不是最劣等的?
前苏联巴库地区矿工起义,前南韩的光州起义,人可是都是拿家伙,至少是锋利铁器造反,苏共和当时的南韩总统全斗焕也不过是动用有限武力(橡皮子弹,铁棍棒,催泪瓦斯...)镇压,反观89。64学运,支那学生市民,和平请愿,绝食却遭支共装甲,坦克,机关枪,火焰喷射器毫无顾忌的对手无寸铁的示威群众虐杀,请问世界上又哪个民族的政府犯下如此暴行后还能受其国民拥护不倒的?纵观支共屠戮百姓的历史,3反5反,四清,镇反,杀地主,资本家,反右,文革,饥荒。。。上亿人的生命灰飞烟灭,支共甚至至今连句i am sorry都没说过,从来不需要哪怕是最微弱无力,稍加掩饰的借口,希特勒杀犹太人也没这么嚣张吧?至少还关集中营秘密处决,支共枪毙人必开万人,数十万人公审大会,而这种以国家名义进行的屠杀都是非正义的,请问犯下如此罪行恶性的支共至今仍然能够接收支那贱奴的万民敬仰,顶礼膜拜,这样的支那民族不是世界上最劣等的民族,谁是?
别告诉我支共愚民洗脑厉害,新闻封锁厉害,前东欧,前苏联,前共产集权国家哪个不是这样的,人家的人民就懂得抗争,支那愚民呢?至今醉生梦死,得过且过,看看普通支那百姓的生活,简直比中古世纪的奴隶生活的惨景还不如,敢于自焚,自杀却不敢勇敢的拿起武器和独裁统治集团抗争,这样的民族不劣等,谁劣等?
[-] TuneGreat1213 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 15:38:23
結論:動物都比🕷️更有權享用這塊土地
[-] Hopeful_Tale_1934 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 15:46:07
毕竟被秦制和商鞅五术奴役、逆向淘汰了几千年的文明边缘洼地
[-] Vizima124 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 16:01:23
Sometimes I look at this sub to see what Chinese dissent looks like, and am saddened to see (through Google translate) that this is an absurdly racist and self hating post. To bring about great change in China, you don't have to hate yourself, you have to hate your system.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:03:36
The vast majority of Chinese-language political comments still exist mainly on Chinese websites (even dissent), but in recent years, China's online censorship has become more severe, so dissent is often deleted, and the account of dissident publishers is often suspended from commenting. Twenty years of online censorship has led to the emergence of a large number of voices in support of the authorities, which are irrational and even support the authorities' allies to wage war. The deteriorating online environment for dissidents has allowed them to build up their anger, sometimes blaming those who support the CCP.
[-] Vizima124 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:10:19
I understand completely (and despise the CCP), but the amount of racial self-hatred here is just weird. It makes you guys look kind of crazy.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:12:24
I agree with what you said. Most political discussions in Chinese, whether pro-government or anti-government, contain a lot of irrational, hateful and racist comments. This is a tragedy for the Chinese Internet. Subs like this are clearly set up to vent resentment rather than serious discussion. I think China_irl is more representative of the views of ordinary Chinese dissidents, it does not include racist content, but it is also not a high-quality rational discussion. As a Chinese, in my experience more serious Chinese political discussions are likely to be concentrated in small circles, through private telegram groups rather than public forums.
[-] Vizima124 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:14:49
Yea, I've seen that sub, it seems be more split 50/50 for pro/anti-ccp.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:28:25
Perhaps a kind of self-depravity after disappointment. Actually I'm not even totally against the CCP myself (as they are indeed financially successful), but I've been browsing subs like this more and more frequently after the censorship tightened in recent years. Officially guided irrational voices impair everyone's ability to think logically. But I think there is hope. Under the strict censorship of speech, Chinese forums still see a lot of dissent speech, which means that there are more real dissenters than they appear. Maybe it just need an "accident" similar to the late 1980s, but it's actually an inevitable event.
[-] Vizima124 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:32:31
I'm curious, how is there dissent in Chinese forms? Aren't you usually required to connect your identity before you post?
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:40:32
Yes, Chinese online forums require real names, and this has only been mandatory in recent years, which reflects the tightening of speech controls. Compared with other countries, China's online dissent is not very special. Some are outright criticism of the government, and some more sensitive topics, people use some memes for symbolic satire. If you criticize the government on specific policies, you usually enjoy a certain amount of freedom of speech, but if it is a straightforward speech to overthrow the regime, it is much more dangerous.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:40:56
Yes, Chinese online forums require real names, and this has only been mandatory in recent years, which reflects the tightening of speech controls. Compared with other countries, China's online dissent is not very special. Some are outright criticism of the government, and some more sensitive topics, people use some memes for symbolic satire. If you criticize the government on specific policies, you usually enjoy a certain amount of freedom of speech, but if it is a straightforward speech to overthrow the regime, it is much more dangerous.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:47:44
For example, criticism of the government's stricter control of Western cultural products can generally be more direct. But if you want to criticize President Xi, you need to use some symbolic method, such as criticizing North Korea, Cuba, or Chinese leaders before 1978, and many people will quickly realize that they are actually satirizing the current President of China.
[-] Vizima124 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:50:36
Assuming you are from China, have you seen the effects of the CCP educating young people with extreme nationalism in online discourse?
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 18:04:03
Officials don't seem to publish ultra-nationalist and xenophobic content directly, as they are still nominally communist (though in reality authoritarian capitalism, like Taiwan and South Korea before democratization). But they are deliberately indulging such comments to bolster their support among the people, which are often anti-Western. Some private, government-sponsored media are more deliberately drawn to xenophobia, such as portraying the United States as evil, pro-Western economic failures as stupid, and allies such as Russia as friendly and righteous. But they don't use any racist words to avoid criticism, but by deliberately choosing news that they only want you to see. For example, Russia and Ukraine are two countries with the same economic failure, but when reporting on Russia, they tend to prefer positive news such as victory, while when reporting on Ukraine, they tend to choose negative news such as poverty and serious corruption.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 18:09:20
Sorry I didn't seem to see your question clearly. The CCP's influence on young people's minds is long-term and subtle, but also very effective. There are many young Chinese now questioning the benefits of democracy and free speech, and even supporting the establishment of a firewall for censorship. I don't think it can be done without political propaganda and censorship.
[-] CommanderSykes | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 18:25:51
Unlike North Korea and Cuba, China is a country with a comparatively developed economy and ubiquitous Internet. Many people understand how to use proxy tools to break through online censorship. But they still choose to support the government to squeeze the space for free speech. This is special because their view of the world has been shaped, exposure to western internet will not change their perceptions. And the reason why a government like North Korea can continue to exist is more because most people are cut off from outside information. I don't think the North Korean government wants the economy to develop, because it will lead to its collapse.
[-] Immediate_Aioli_6941 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:07:56
本来就劣等,不但没有跟自己的劣根性做斗争,还新加了各种坏毛病。
[-] Open-Lingonberry-808 | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 17:20:52
东亚民族就别碰瓷了
[-] fengzhibitu | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 19:55:23
吴越民族曾经也很优秀,日本的文明都是通过他们传过去的,后来被猪圈纳入大一统了,然后就没有然后了
[-] Illustrious-Fudge-90 | 1 points | Mar 06 2022 04:00:12
這些可以當飯吃嗎?支那第一反應
[-] Tight-Pomegranate-21 | 1 points | Mar 06 2022 05:10:01
希特勒的观点:日耳曼民族、大和民族最优秀,黑绿支最劣等,看看这个世界就发现大体上就是这么一回事了
[-] Infinite-Cod-2678 | 1 points | Mar 07 2022 07:01:28
优秀民族不是被干爆了?虽然现在回来了
[-] Tight-Pomegranate-21 | 1 points | Mar 06 2022 05:10:06
希特勒的观点:日耳曼民族、大和民族最优秀,黑绿支最劣等,看看这个世界就发现大体上就是这么一回事了
[-] toosimpleyoung | 1 points | Mar 05 2022 15:33:30
综上而言,不图能行吗?